Abstract

This Element compares crisis-specific policymaking, its causes and consequences, at the two levels of the EU polity during the COVID-19 and the refugee crisis 2015–16. In both crises, EU policymaking responded to exogenous pressure and was dominated by executive decision-making. Still, it also differed in three critical aspects: it was much more salient, consensual, and effective during the COVID-19 than the refugee crisis. The present study accounts for both similarities and differences, which it attempts to explain by features of the nature of the crises. The key argument of the study is that the policymaking process during crises is, to a large extent, determined by the crisis situation – the crisis-specific functional problem pressure, the institutional context (of the EU polity), and the corresponding political pressure at the origin of a given crisis.

To cite this book:

Kriesi H. Crisis Policymaking in the EU: The COVID-19 Crisis and the Refugee Crisis 2015-16 Compared. Cambridge University Press; 2025.

from the same author:

Dynamics of protest mobilisation in the European poly-crisis – Journal of European Public Policy

Crisis situation and crisis policymaking: a comparison of Germany and Hungary in two refugee crises – Journal of European Public Policy

Coming to Terms with the European Refugee Crisis – Cambridge University Press